All rights reserved, Karin Gustafson.
If you like elephants as well as dogs, check out 1 Mississippi, at link above.
Re New York Times article of September 30 byMatt Richtel, “At 60 M.P.H., Office Work Is High Risk ,” here are thirteen (or more) reasons not to turn your car into an office:
1. The car in front of you.
2. The car behind you.
3. The cars on either side of you.
4. The child who is in one or more of those cars. (Also, the adult.)
5. The child that you may be driving to school (or the one who is already sitting in school.)
6. Your frontal lobe.
7. The hot – very hot – cup of coffee clasped between your legs (despite the warning emblazoned on its styrofoam sides that that coffee is “hot, very hot.”)
8. The fact that you are evidencing to all persons with whom you come in contact, either digitally or through the window, (a) your complete lack of common sense, and (b) your narcissistic grandiosity regarding your own significance in the global world of commerce.
9. The negative effect upon the demand for good public transportation i.e. a commuter rail or bus system, that would allow you to gab or type away while only irritating people, not threatening their lives. (Sorry, that one’s awfully PC.)
10. The muting effect caused by headphones on (a) talk radio, (b) EZ listenin’. (I guess that one’s kind of a benefit.)
11. The oncoming speeding car. (Oh wait—that’s you.)
12. Can it really not wait till you pull over?
13. Are you that bored with life?
The last few days I’ve written about parenting–engaging young kids and encouraging “make-believe”–and sonnets. So today, I thought I’d combine all subjects. (I don’t mean the “make-believe” comment to refer to the religious aspects of the poem, but the bedtime story.) The sonnet is Shakespearean in rhyme scheme (and attempted meter.)
My Father
My father knelt beside my bed; his round head
reflecting the bedside lamp with the look
of lighting within. “And the genie,” he said,
“came out of a big blue jar.” Not from a book
were the stories he told me at night.
Always of genies who were big-blue-jarred
and did fairly little, only the slight
magic of minor wishes, often ill-starred.
Though the stories were just a warm up to
the bedtime prayer. “Our Father,” that would start,
then straight out head for “hallowed”, “trespass” too,
unknown words, to me a spell he knew by heart,
invoking, croakingly, a wished-for will
that the blue genied jar could never fulfill.
(All rights reserved. Karin Gustafson)
An article by Paul Tough, in The New York Times on September 25th, called “Can The Right Kinds of Play Lead To Self-Control?” brought me to a dramatic realization.
I have terrific kids; they are tolerant of others, and though not automatonic, stiff, or repressed —they are kids—they have been patient, co-operative, and self-controlled pretty much since passing the bounds of young childhood. All these years I’ve been (secretly) congratulating myself on my parenting. I knew I wasn’t particularly schooled in parenting, and I’ve never actually thought my parenting out that much—still I privately believed that the results (i.e. my children) must demonstrate some innate maternal skill.
Now it turns out that all these great qualities in my children are primarily due to the fact that they played loads and loads of make-believe.
And, on top of that, even though I’ve sometimes characterized myself as a bit of a single parent, I really do have to give a bunch of credit to their dad, who was terrifically good at fomenting imagination games, particularly if they involved blocks or little playmobil figures. (He is someone who had a couple of thousand toy soldiers as a boy, so he was extremely practiced in the set-up of forts, installations, whole towns, and any other type of miniaturized construct.)
After reading Tough’s article, in fact, I’m not sure I deserve much credit as a parent at all. I will protest that I did supply the occasional comic voice in many games of make-believe. (Usually I played a rather duncelike- compulsive figure, Mr. Potato Man, who was represented by a small plastic snoopy dog with a sack of potatoes plasticized to his back.) I also talked stuffed animals, provided tea sets, watered down “tea”, and had certain of my own playmobil and block skills. (It wasn’t all their dad.)
And, when there were no actual toys handy, I supplied puppets made up of my talking hands and one forearm.
But, frankly, my main pratical, measurable, contribution was to turn off the TV.
Since TV did have to be on some of the time, I made our TV as unattractive as I could, for as long as I could, retaining antiquated and very small television sets. (I remember my mother, horrified, to hear my daughter proclaim after watching a well-known program at her house – “I didn’t know Big Bird was yellow.”)
Finally, I was blessed to be able to arrange long periods of time (i.e. summers) in beautiful places where there was no TV at all. (I realize that not everyone has such phenomenal luck.)
The result was a great deal of make-believe.
I really do believe that TV, and now the computer, can be insidious for developing minds. (I won’t even go into the problems discussed by Jane Brody today in the article “From Birth, Engage Your Child With Talk” about the distractions electronic devices provide to caregivers.)
Yes, there is often something good on. A program that is ostensibly enriching, educational.
But it’s still not the same as playing “sick baby” with leaves for medicine and pine cones for shots, and, if you’re lucky, a younger sibling who (for a short time at least) is willing to lie still.
It’s not even as good as “Mr. Potato Man.”
I have just spent the last few hours trying to download and/or convert illustrations of a cheerful pantoum to post in order to compensate for the somewhat grim pantoum I posted a couple of days ago. (See e.g. “Pantoums – Hard Hard Hard – Overheard on the Esplanade”).
This has led me to an entirely new subject matter.
Why do people hate computers so much? (Given all the marvelous things they do for us.)
Here’s my guess:
1. Because they are too expensive to throw out the window.
2. Because they are too heavy to throw out the window. (Anyone they hit, if surviving, will undoubtedly sue you, and may also steal your passwords.)
3. Because if you complain about them, you will sound both decrepit and curmudgeonly. Anyone overhearing will say, in a calm, slightly amused voice, ‘why don’t you let me try?’ and will try to sit in your computer chair and take over your keyboard, all the while ignoring the curmudgeonly gritting of your (probably soon to be false) teeth.
4. Because they lure you on with the possibility that whatever you are trying really might work this time if only you are patient and wait the ever increasing and decreasing and increasing number of seconds of the download period. Then, just as you get to what looks like almost the end of the download, they freeze again.
5. Because there is no convenient place to hit your computer, and if you do, you’ll probably hurt your typing fingers.
6. Because your eyes are burning, but you just can’t stop looking at the screen.
7. Because you know that any email you may get at 1:02 a.m. is probably spam, but you can’t resist checking. Like Mallory before Everest, you check your email (in both accounts) because it’s there, or at least, it may be there.
8. Because you just checked your email and there was only spam. And you just checked your other email and there wasn’t even spam.
9. Because it really should have worked by now. Under all the age-old and new age laws of despair and giving up and great things happening when you finally do surrender, and happy endings too, it really should have worked. (Don’t computers read literature? Self-help books? Self-help E-books?)
10. Because your whole life’s work is held hostage. (By the way, what happened to your earlier life’s work on that old machine that died suddenly five years ago?)
If you would rather read books than e-books, and books with pictures at that, check out 1 Mississippi at link above.
P.S. sorry about the illustrated pantoum. My computer and I will figure it out someday.
The above image is from 1 Mississippi. (Copyright Karin Gustafson) Check it out at link or on Amazon.
If you’d rather think about poetry than Monday, check out poetry blogs; if you’re having a hard time writing, check out writers’ block blogs; if you’d rather just laugh (at me), check out Robert Pattinson blogs.
I make no comment here on Roman Polanski’s crime, punishment, or long evasion of the U.S. judicial system.
I only wanted to note that the Swiss must be madder than ever at us (the U.S.) right now. Not only have we wrought havoc on their bank secrecy laws, but now we are invading their Oscar (should I say “Oskar”) ceremony.
I’m guessing that it might be a good time to stock up on chocolate; it may be very hard to get the good stuff soon.
(PS – I have to say I really don’t know what the Swiss attitude is to all this yet. It really is a guess. I also don’t mean to sound glib about Polanski’s original crime.)
Recent Comments