I was wondering, yesterday, while walking on the street checking my email why people do this–i.e. check their email while walking on the street.
I tell myself that it’s because humans, in general, are a communicating species.
Communication brings a kind of acknowledgement (or at least a hope of acknowledgment). It’s almost as hard for people (even people other than me) to live without acknowledgment as to live without air. (Hence, the infamous rigors of solitary confinement.)
Is acknowledgement particularly important to humans. Does any non-human animal ask whether a tree falls if there is no one there to hear it? (How can we know? If an animal doesn’t articulate such thoughts to us, do they actually think them?)
In old-time small towns, at least in my grandmother’s small town (as seen through my grandmother’s eyes), there was always someone watching–acknowledging, as it were–through a blinds’ eye gaze, even when the small streets seemed absolutely asleep. (It can get hot in the mid-day mid-summer Midwest.)
This grandmother refused to let us hang out wet clothes to dry on an Tuesday afternoon. Washing was for Mondays, or at least, mornings. She couldn’t stand to have our disorganization noted.
This grandmother would not have texted or emailed while walking.
Cities offer the freedom of greater anonymity. We city dwellers further this by training ourselves to avoid the gazes of those around us.
Extremely well-trained city dwellers walk around in little self-contained bubbles, boxes, hoping that our own clear walls will help hold up the walls of those around us. (We’re a bit like little buildings; all self-contained, all nearly leaning against each other.)
But there’s still this communicating-species business, this need for acknowledgement. So, as we move our little box around (or, in the suburbs or country–our car), we text, email, talk on the phone.
“What’s up?”
“How about you?”
Oddly, as I was writing this post, I happened upon what looked like a live woman (or realistic sculpture) in a plexiglass box standing just near the center of the Grand Central Station.
Many people had gathered around it. It was as if a woman in a clear-walled box was something they’d hardly ever seen.
Overly Cute Depictions of Fox (both as in News and Tails)
August 25, 2010Unfortunately, it sometimes feels like Comedy Central, through the Daily Show with Jon Stewart and the Colbert Report, provides the most probing commentary on TV. In the August 23rd episode, Stewart examines Fox News’ allegations of possible nefarious ties between Park51, the organization trying to build the Islamic Center near Ground Zero, and the Kingdom Foundation run, as the Fox morning show casts it, by a shadowy “guy”, vaguely brought up next to the words Iran, ” who tried to give Rudy Giuliani 10 million after 9/11 and they had to give it back, a guy who funds radical madrassas all over the world.” This “guy”, never actually named by Fox, is then revealed by Stewart to be Saudi Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal, head of Kingdom Foundation, also a major shareholder in News Corporation, parent corp of Fox News.
The Daily Show goes on with a rif on whether Fox’s failure to properly identify Bin Talal arose from evil or stupidity (Wyatt Cenac taking the part of evil, John Oliver siding with stupid).
I was inspired. Unfortunately, I can’t draw mordant, only cute. Still, after doing the drawings, I noticed a suprising, if vague, resemblance—
Sly Fox
Hmmm....
Hmmm.....
(Note that the above images are subject to copyright.)
Categories: News Media, Uncategorized
Tags: August 23 Daily Show, Bill O'Reilly as sly fox, Fox and Alwaleed Bin Talal, Fox and Jon Stewart, Fox and The Daily Show, Glenn Beck as dazed fox, images of Fox, manicddaily, Manicddaily fox drawings, Manicddaily watercolors, news commentary re "Ground Zero Mosque", overly cute depictions of Fox, Park51
Comments: Be the first to comment