Poor polar bears have fewer places farther in between as arctic ice floes melt.
I am posting this drawing, which you will notice has no elephants, from iPhone. If there are not TWO polar bears in it, you may need to click on the drawing. Thanks.
“Pearl!” I called down to the Hudson. “I know you feel a special sympathy for polar bears–” (I think it’s the white fur/ black nose thing)–”but, seriously, this is going too far.”
“Errruuurrrmmmmmm,” Pearl replied.
Setting Pearl aside for a minute (while she’s still within range), it’s hard for us in the frigid Eastern U.S. to focus on the fact that this has been the second of two freakishly warm winters in the Arctic. Scientists postulate that this is part of the reason for all the “excess” cold both here and in Europe–the circulation of various Polar jet streams has broken from usual vortexes, allowing arctic air to swoop down in exchange for warmer air swooping up. Some scientists are concerned that this two-year change may signal long-term damage to a so-called arctic “fence” –see an article about it here.
In the meantime—”Pearrrrrrllll!”
According to a recent New York Times article, Tea Partiers tend not to believe in climate change, or, if they do at least accept statistics of changing temperatures, they do not believe that the causes have anything to do with man. One big rationale for this doubt is apparently religious faith. The classic Tea Party reading of the Bible seems to be that since the Earth (and all of creation) is made to be used, or as some say, “utilized,” by man (read Americans), he/we can’t really wreck it.
“They’re trying to use global warming against the people,” Lisa Deaton, founder of We The People Indiana, said. “It takes away our liberty.”
“Being a strong Christian,” she added, “I cannot help but believe the Lord placed a lot of minerals in our country and it’s not there to destroy us.”
Some variations on this thought.
I cannot help but believe:
Oh, great.
I am currently lying under a fleece blanket and two down comforters. The heating unit at my side is turned off. I could jump quickly into the cold, twist it on, then slip back into my lair, but, for some reason, I just don’t.
I’m not quite sure what this reason is. I pay for heat in my apartment, so there’s an element of miserliness. It’s blown hot air (dry and noisy), so there’s simple distaste. There’s also, of course, my heightened, if terribly inconsistent, environmental consciousness. Then too, there’s the memory of my last apartment where Super-controlled heat blasts made for January sweats.
All of these combine into a perverse, hardier-than-thou, pride that keeps the heating units switched off.
I have recently found that this pride makes me part of “Cool Crowd,” a class of people depicted in the New York Times the other day who eschew indoor heat in cold climates.
Being part of this cool crowd feels really great (despite the weight of the blankets). I always was embarrassingly unhip as a child. Actually, I’ve felt unhip my entire life. I’ve rarely known the names or music of hot bands, TV shoes, movies, films. My slang, like Alec Guiness’s “Mahtabili” in the film classic Kind Hearts and Coronets, has always been “a little bit rusty.”
Given the fact that the temperature in my apartment probably rarely dips below 50/45 (I don’t have a thermostat), I’m guessing that I’m only on the “luke” edge of the “cool crowd”. Even so, no less than three members of my family separately asked me if I had seen the NY Times article.
These family members are extremely patient. They don’t openly groan during my monologues about the merits of long silk underwear, the importance of wool, the risks of sock-removal. They joke about the fact that I constantly tell them that they can turn on the heat, if they want, then proceed to turn it off again (if they’ve dared) after only a few minutes.
I warn them against wimpiness. I regale them with tales about the time the water in my toilet bowl froze. I protest that this is not about me disliking warmth, reminding them that I don’t turn on the AC in summer either. They don’t actually need reminders of that.
Ah, Summer. That’s when we get to be part of “who’s hot.”
P.S. – sorry for any misspelling of Mahtabili. Please feel free to correct.
I’m all for solar power, wind power, and other renewable alternatives to fossil fuels. But during last night’s bitter cold, which was especially frigid in Battery Park City (where I live), the prow of the stationary ship which is Manhattan, I discovered an eminently traditional, and yet not fully tapped, form of alternative energy (i.e. heat). The hot water bottle.
Seriously. It was terrific. Better than wool socks. (Maybe not as good as a nearby warm body, but warm bodies don’t necessarily put up with cold feet other than their own.)
As a caveat, I should say that I keep my apartment relatively (my kids say, ‘extremely’) cool (my kids say, ‘freezing’) in winter. Besides trying to keep my carbon footprint to a toeprint, I find hot air heat too dry. This means that I basically turn all the heat off at night. (Okay, so maybe my kids are right.)
But last night called for measures beyond wool socks, a down comforter, and even a nearby warm body.
I have to confess to a past prejudice against hot water bottles, their rubbery exteriors so (potentially, at least) slimy and nubbly. Besides my innate repugnance, my only personal experience with hot water bottles was in Mussoorie, India, a town in the foothills of the Himalayas, bordering Rishikesh (the hang-out of Maharaji Mahesh Yogi the Beatles’ guru) and Dehra Dun (a favorite locale of Rudyard Kipling).
Mussoorie, though a very nice town, probably sounds more romantic than it is, at least when you are there alone, as I was. It was green, hilly, and, on the small main road had a small boy who ran alongside a single thin wheel which he propelled with a stick. On a clear day, there was a tower you could climb where you could supposedly see Tibet. (I was not there on any clear days.)
Other than that, all I remember about Mussoorie is that it was very cold at night and that in my guest house, a remnant of the Raj, guests were distributed hot water bottles after dinner. These, a sickly blue green, were covered in a worn crochet of thick bright red and purple yarn; up by the corked top was a dog-eared yarn flower.
My memory of these hot water bottles is somewhat muddled by the baths in that same hotel. The tubs were portable, small and tin, just about big enough for a squat. When I came back to the hotel in the late afternoons, there was, next to the little tin tub, a very large aluminum tea kettle coated in an even larger quilted tea cozy. Though the water in this kettle was close to boiling (depending upon when one came back to the room), there was only enough to fill the very cold noisy tub to the depth of an inch or two. I remember taking all baths in at least one wool sweater.
Unfortunately, the crochet-covered hot water bottle and the tea-cozy-covered bath water became inextricably linked in my mind. As a result, I always thought of hot water bottles with a shiver from the waist down.
Until last night, that is, when my husband, in response to the buzzing cold of my feet, found a dark red hot water bottle in the back of a bathroom cabinet, and filled it up to the brim.
What a revelation! My own little heat pillow. My own little adjustable portable hearth. At virtually no cost! Using minimal fossil fuel!
Okay, so, it sounds silly. But it also seems a useful paradigm for reducing U.S. energy consumption. Heating one small actually used space, as needed, instead of the nonstop heating of a whole apartment, or house. A helpful idea even when oil has not yet gotten back up to $100 a barrel. (News alert—it went over $81 today.)
No crochet required.
ps- if you prefer paintings of elephants to hot water bottles, check out 1 Mississippi by Karin Gustafson.
Recent Comments