My mother, not believing that anyone would ever want to marry her, had two choices as a young girl.
I call them “choices”–I should say that she had two dreams. Only they weren’t actually “dreams”–simply her view of best possible outcomes.
One was to be a teacher, the other a nurse.
My mother was born in the U.S. to an extremely Northern European-type family that could not “be having with” bodies, so she opted, eventually, for teacher.
Pay attention to the “eventually.” Long before she could dream of (or, accept) becoming a teacher, her father wanted her to be a hired girl.
A hired girl back in the 1930‘s was someone who basically did dishes–that is, drew, carried and heated water for dishes, made things to be put on dishes, cleaned up what resulted from things put on dishes. Hired girls usually lived in someone else’s house so that they could work just about any time of day (as in, all hours of the–.)
Not that my grandfather thought his daughter could not manage becoming a teacher or nurse–she was the valedictorian of her high school–he just thought she should take the first paying job she could get; being a hired girl had the added bonus of also providing for her keep.
But my mother persisted–and to my grandfather’s credit, he let her persist–and World War II served as a stepping stone out of hired girldom, allowing her, under its heavy cloud, to take on greater variety of work than ever previously available to women. Her burning desire to visit California turned, oddly, not into a trip to California, but into a job with the U.S. occupation force in Yokohama, Japan where she lived from 1947-1949.
On her return to the U.S., there were her same choices once again–teacher/nurse–and–oh yes–typist. Ironically, after earning (and personally paying for) her college degree, her career dream was to become a typist with the U.S. foreign service. But by that time, amazingly to her, she had found someone to marry her, someone she loved; being a married woman in the U.S. foreign service was simply not a go.
My mother was not a born teacher. She cared deeply about helping kids learn and she worked extremely hard–but she did not have the gift of maintaining control of a class. This meant that teaching (often with 32 or 33 in a room) could be a nightmare (as in, she sometimes cried at night.) Still, she kept at it for thirty years.
Did I mention that in the first full year of my life she had to pretend that I didn’t exist? This, because of a law in Maryland at that time, which automatically reduced a teacher’s pay to substitute’s rates (i.e. maybe two-thirds) if she had a child at home below the age of one.
After that first year in hiding, I had many more choices than my mother, in part because her second salary in our household helped pay for my good education.
But, unlike the male members of my family, I simply did not have what it took to pursue the careers of my heart. How much did this relate to my being a woman? All I know for certain is that I just didn’t have the ego, confidence, self-esteem, or just plain selfishness, to reach for my wishes. As in the case of my mother, my dreams felt like the moon to me–not because I wasn’t talented enough, but because I wasn’t somehow cool enough, hip enough, deserving enough–qualities that seemed especially important in a girl reaching for the moon. Because the jobs I needed to take to support myself while I aimed for the moon–i.e. being a waitress to support myself while trying to make it as a writer–exposed me at times to a kind of dismissive treatment from the world that my weak ego just couldn’t stomach.
Then, finally, there was the guilt (where the reduced selfishness comes in.) My mother really wanted me to to have a clearly defined way of earning a good wage–i.e. “something to fall back on.” I just couldn’t bear to disappoint her.
So rather than become a hired girl, I became a lawyer (a “hired gun” as some used to call it.) Only it turned out being an attorney is not something you actually fall back on, but rather it is a job you actively need to pursue many hours of the day.
Many things about this choice have been heart-wrenching; yet it also turned out to be extremely fortunate. Because, like many women of my generation, I ended up unexpectedly and for years as the primary source of my children’s support. (Making me, in other words, very glad to have the steady wage my mother pushed me towards.)
I want to say this first: I am so grateful to my employers for the jobs I’ve had. There are too many men and women both who have no chance of any good job; too many men and women who don’t even consider fulfilling a dream, too many men and women who, even working night and day, cannot provide for their children.
My complaint is just that there are so many many many women in the non-dream boat–women holding the bag, women raising the kids, women holding the bag and raising the kids. There are so many women, who have so few choices in how they make their living, only knowing that they better hurry up and get busy at it.
Of course, there are men in this situation too. Many obstacles in life are not gender-based. Yet the fact remains that in the U.S. and the world, the majority of those living in poverty are women and children. (The non-dream boat isn’t exactly a life boat, even if one feels stuck in it for life.) This is not because of women’s liberation–women have not “empowered” themselves into lives in poverty–(the women’s liberation movement did not begin in a context in which women had control over the economic and personal lives)–this is because of all kinds of worldwide economic and societal factors.
I am convinced, based on her lifelong career, that Hillary Clinton cares for these women. I am not saying that she gives preference to women and their work and dreams over the work and dreams of men. But she understands the special challenges that women face based upon our history and the reality of our present, and she understands that in much of the greater world, especially, helping women to some share of economic power must be a priority.
My own (albeit lucky) history makes my support of HRC extremely personal. Because mixed in with my devotion to Hillary is my devotion to my mother, my devotion to mother’s sister (who worked for over forty years as a dietician, which then was like a non-body-touching nurse), my devotion to one of my mother’s other sister (a stay-at-home mom who taught briefly and thereafter seemed to yearn almost desperately for some income of her own), my mother’s other sister (who was brain-damaged and, though beloved, the reason my mother believed that no one in that eugenics-prone age would ever marry any of them)—-
Mixed in with my devotion to Hillary is my devotion to all the wonderful teachers and nurses, I have known, the secretaries and waitresses —
my devotion to my Dad (a scientist), my husband (a nature lover),
and, most strongly, my devotion to my daughters, who may not get the jobs of their dreams but at least are strong enough to choose fields based on their vocations and not their gender–
and to my baby granddaughter, who, every time she sees me, says moon, pointing up–