Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ category

Amendments Republicans Didn’t Think Of

March 26, 2010

No Transfusions For Vampires

On Thursday, in the confusing process which I understand is required by our bi-cameral very-keen-on-procedure Congress, the Senate passed a budget reconciliation bill which allowed for the final passage of the new health care legislation.  In the process, more than forty amendments to the bill were proposed by Republican senators, including several from Republican Tom Coburn of Oklahoma;  perhaps the most colorful of these was an amendment prohibiting coverage of Viagra and other Erectile Dysfunction medications to convicted child molesters, rapists, and sex offenders.

Somehow one feels certain that the purpose of this type of amendment is to cast a shadow of malevolence on the benefits offered by the new legislation.  (There seems to be a desire to create a feeling that, without the amendment, the bill would operate as a kind of Americans With Disabilities Act for those covered by Meghan’s Law.)

Here are a few amendments that got dropped from the Republican list:

1.  No more than fifty (50) month-supply prescriptions per day may be covered for convicted narcotics offenders.

2.  No “herbal” supplements for potheads.

3.  No chiropractic coverage to W.W.E. hall of famer Quebecois Mad Dog Vachon unless an American passport and an original American birth certificate are provided.

4.   No acupuncture coverage for acrobatic Shaolin Monks temporarily visiting the U.S. from China.

5.   No acupuncture coverage to anyone permanently moved to the U.S. from China.

6.   Or Mexico.

7.  Or anywhere else.

8.  Including Hawaii.

7.  No rolfing for residents of California.

8.  No medical tattoo removal coverage for Jesse James.  Such expenses may be coverable for Michelle Bombshell McGee but on only on personal application.

9.  No blood transfusions for vampires unless named Bill Compton or Edward Cullen.  (Sorry, Eric.)

Blocking Writer’s Block – Post-Partum Embarrassment

March 25, 2010

 

Circle of hell for one's own work

 

Embarrassment is not so much of a problem when one is writing as when one has written. Shortly after the piece is more or less “done”, the excitement, the satisfaction, the engagement, of doing the work peters out.

Okay, sure, there’s a moment of “whew”.  Maybe even “wow.”  And then, like carefully-cut fruit turning brown around the edges, the whole thing seems  tawdry, sour, over-ripe.

This feeling often sets in around the time you start showing your work to others. When you glance at the piece through their imagined eyes, you wonder how you were ever satisfied.  You feel exposed, ridiculous.

It’s worse than seeing one’s self in a bad photo, in a brightly-lit mirror, at one’s worst angle.  When looking at a depiction of one’s physical self, feelings of inadequacy are often tempered by surprise, even disbelief—( Is that really what I look like?)  Even as one cringes, one’s image is so different from the self one imagines it hardly feels possible.  Besides that surprise, we are most of us well trained enough in the idea of people not being able to help their looks to have some grudging acceptance of our physical aspect.  (Other than of our fat, I suppose.)

A special circle of hell is saved for the sound of one’s own voice, either heard or read.

This hell, this embarrassment, can make it almost impossible for a writer to get his or her work out in the world.

Despite the daily appearance of blog, I really do have some problems with this.  Nonetheless (with typical “do as I say, not as I do” bravura), I’ll posit some suggestions:

1.  Collaborate.   Share the work process before your work is finished so that it’s less of a struggle to share it afterwards.  There are many different levels of collaboration, which may or may not include co-authorship.   The simplest may just be doing writing exercises with someone—writing at the same time as they are, then reading your writing aloud to each other.    (This is like taking your clothes off absolutely simultaneously with someone else.  Easier if you both pull down the pants at one time. )

The frigid sea (of exposure) also feels better if you hold hands with someone and run into the surf together.  Meaning, if you want to try to read in public fora—poetry readings or slams—go with a writing buddy first;  make yourselves both sign the sign-up sheet.  No turning back.  Clap loudly for your friend.

2.  Shut your eyes.  Get your piece as good as you can, send it into the world,  and then, if you can’t bear to face it again, don’t.  Don’t re-read it endlessly once you start circulating it (at least not for a while.)   If it’s published, and you can’t bear others to know, just don’t tell them.

3.  Understand that you are not your work.  It is, at most, a glimpse of your brain’s inner workings for one relatively short period of time;  a simulacrum of a synaptical dance.  If someone doesn’t like it, it doesn’t mean they don’t like you.  If someone reads it, it doesn’t mean that they actually know you.  Distance yourself from the content of the work;  distance yourself from the feelings of exposure.   This takes discipline.  Don’t wallow.

4.  Don’t worry that everything you do may not be your best work.  People’s taste run wide gamuts.  Sometimes you/they are in the mood for brown rice; sometimes you/they are in the mood for whipped cream;  sometimes for oranges.   (i.e. you can’t please all the people all the time;  actually,  you can’t even please some of the people all the time.   And maybe, well, you should worry a little less about pleasing. )

5.  Be happy that you have completed some work at all.  Always keep in mind how wonderful that feeling was when you first finished, how wonderful to have just slogged through.

The Threats of Loss (Health Care Vigilantism)

March 24, 2010

What I meant to say was....

Sore losers.

I do understand.  When George W. Bush won the presidency in one of those two awful elections (I can’t remember which), I had to avoid my pro-Bush secretary from early November until the office Christmas Party.   This was not easy.   First of all, I really liked my secretary.  Secondly, I needed his help.

He didn’t taunt me; he didn’t gloat.

Still I felt so upset, so exposed, that I found myself gently avoiding direct contact, waiting until he was out getting a smoke before I passed by his desk to drop off a signed letter to be mailed, or a document to be filed.  (I used a lot of little post-its.)

What was even more galling was that his desk was en route to the office coffee/ tea machine, so I had to resort to long-cuts, i.e. detours through out-of-office corridors in order to fill up on my daily six or seven cuppas.

A hard-fought loss is painful,  leaves a bitter taste.  I understand that.   But I really am sick of what’s going on at the moment;  all this talk of Obama “ramming” the health care legislation through the Congress; Republicans and talk radio/TV conservatives acting as if Obama’s somehow done something unconstitutional or illegal to get the bill passed, as if a crowbar, a gun to the head, an arm behind the back, has been used, when, in fact, there was a vote of legally-elected senators and congressmen.

This is how the system works.  It is how it also worked under President Bush, who despite failing to win the popular vote in the first term, governed as if he had both an electoral mandate and divine fiat.  It is how it has worked since the U.S. government was formed.

Incendiary talk sparks slash and burn conduct.   The slurs aimed at congressmen who were going to vote in favor of the health care bill has now morphed into threats and vandalism against those who cast their votes.

Republican leader, John A. Boehner, has said that the violence is unacceptable, but in the same message he added, “I know many Americans are angry over this health care bill, and that Washington Democrats just aren’t listening.”   Come on, John.  You can do better than that.

Similarly, the guy that shouted out “Baby-killer” at Bart Stupak, Representative Randy Neugebauer, a conservative Republican from Texas, now claims that what he really said was ‘it’s a baby killer,” referring not to Stupak, but  to the agreement under which Obama said he would issue an executive order pledging that no federal funds be used for abortions.

Oh, please, Randy.   I’m sure that’s exactly what you meant.   And I just bet that’s what you are telling all the high-spirited people who are writing you to praise of the original “baby-killer” remark.  (Wink wink nudge nudge.)

Stupak has now received threatening phone calls.  Democrat Louise M. Slaughter has had a brick thrown through her office window.  The office of Representative Gabrielle Giffords (Democrat from Arizona) has been vandalized.  Black Congressman James Clyburn received a fax of a noose.   The brother of one Congressman, Tom Periello, had a propane line snipped (after his address was wrongly reported on a Tea Party website as the Congressman’s address.)

Is this from the folks so eager to protect the Constitution?

Examining Self-Sabotage (A Shot Foot) (Old Dog New Tricks)

March 23, 2010



A Shot Food

An article in today’s New York Times discusses self-sabotage—that is, many people’s unfortunate tendency to ensure that expectations of disappointment are not disappointed: the bizarre attraction to shooting one’s self in the foot,  because (i)  a wound in the foot looks like a stigmata (i.e. is a good accoutrement to a martyrdom guise), and (ii) a familiar pain feels safer than the risk of an unknown pain (or even pleasure).

I, for one, am very good at this type of self-sabotage.  The article talks of repeated masochistic love affairs.  I’m offering, as an example, a long masochistic love affair with fatigue.  (Let’s not get too personal here.)

If I stand back a little from my own conduct vis-a-vis fatigue, I am aware that much of it– taking too many things on; getting to, and leaving from, my office too late in the day; drinking a very strong cup of tea upon my arrival at home in the evening; doing a lot of goofy evening stuff (i.e. blogging), then staying up very very late reading and re-reading silly books, or doing a crossword, or trolling the internet; getting up super-early to do some of the same exhausted internetty/reading/goofy types of strong-tea-fueled pastimes–is not productive or even all that pleasurable.

If questioned, I will say that my staying up late happens by chance, as if I just get carried away (every single night).  If questioned harder, I might admit that the late nights are an act of will—I’ll say that I need that time to myself to feel that my life is expansive.

If questioned extremely probingly, I may even admit that my schedule of late, crowded (but slightly aimless) nights is one that I stick to with extreme rigidity, despite the resulting exhaustion and reduced productivity.

What’s the answer to this kind of self-sabotage?  The article talks of medication, therapy.

But I look to the sage of my apartment, my dog, Pearl.  Pearl (nearly fifteen) is an extreme creature of habit, particularly now that she is losing her vision.  Pearl knows, for example, the direction that each of her walkers (me, my husband, daughters, nephews) like to take her in (North or South), the exact places (within my building) where her walker will get nervous of her bladder control and pick her up and carry her,  the amount of time each walker will let her sniff and mosey.  Pearl then enforces these patterns, tugging in the walker’s habitual direction, stopping stock still in the spots where she is supposed to be carried, turning recalcitrant when a normally tolerant walker tries to pick up the pace.

Most of Pearl’s walkers just let Pearl have her way.  But sometimes the patterns simply have to be changed, when, for example, Pearl’s side of the sidewalk is covered with salt.  It’s hard to shift Pearl—you have to tug her with some determination, which because she is small, cute, fluffy, can be embarrassing.   She will eventually follow the walker’s tug, however, and then, oddly (after a day or so),  she will become just about as rigid about the new habit as she was about the old.

Which means, I guess, that old dogs can learn new tricks.

Of course, some kind of tug must be there, a determination to make the change.   (I have a feeling I’ll be up late.)

Health Care Bill – End of Long Wait

March 21, 2010

My Quick Attempt At Obama Portrait (Sorry, Mr. President.)

I am so happy for President Obama.

I’ve been waiting all day to blog about the passage of the health care bill by the Congress.

I’ve waited through sleeping late since it was Sunday, through drinking tea and eating olive oil crackers since I had to do my Sunday morning yoga practice which I’m supposed to do on an empty stomach (and somehow tea and crackers don’t count), through hanging out with my sweet husband, through haranguing my sweet husband (in my day-before-the-work-week-starts-angst), through finally doing my yoga, and then, feeling guilty (in the peaceful shadow of the yoga) for haranguing my husband, so also through apologizing to him.

I’ve waited through walking the dog (twice), going to the gym (briefly, since I’d already done yoga), through making dinner for an old old friend, through taking another quick walk with her to a taxi stand—

Of course, it’s been a much longer wait than that; it’s a wait that’s lasted this endless year of characterizations and mischaracterizations and crazy characterizations;  of so many characterizations that how you feel about the bill to some extent depends upon whom you already trust.

Let me add a caveat to that last statement.   There are some characterizations thatI simply cannot believe—these are those made by people who act as if extending health care coverage will be the end of the free world, the destruction of America, the breaking of history, the extinguishing of Liberty’s torch, the termination of personal freedom—what are these people talking about?   Is it some weird rif on the “survival of the fittest?”  That, if people with pre-existing conditions receive health care coverage, the human race will slowly deteriorate.  (Although, weirdly, people who espouse this point of view tend not to believe in evolution.)

It’s a wait that’s gone on through campaign after campaign, administration after administration—so many many many stories of those who have suffered because of their inadequate heath care coverage.  (Some of us may even be characters in some of these stories.)

I actually kind of hate it when candidates try to personalize their speeches with these anecdotes—the thirty-seven year-old mother of two who’s lost her job, health care, car, savings, home.  It’s not that I’m not sympathetic; I sometimes just feel tired of the rhythm of these tales, the predictable cadence of both downfall and meager transcendence.  But I think what I have truly gotten tired of is the fact that the endings are always the same;  no fix has even been tried.

Yes, the bill’s not perfect.  (The world’s not perfect.)    But hey, it’s a start.  Maybe people on the other side will notice that the world has not blown up.

Great congratulations to President Obama for supplementing hope with persistence.

Exercising (Restraint) – Creepy Calories

March 20, 2010

Calories Creeping Up

My husband discusses a recent inadvertent weight loss this morning.  He’s a guy who eats pastries.

Life is so unfair.

Maybe he doesn’t eat pastries every single day.  They are not available to him very single day.

He does eat butter every single day.  (Perhaps I should say every single meal.)

While me—I never eat pastries–except maybe the occasional bite of his (which doesn’t count.)  And I did not consciously taste butter until the  4th grade when I was staying at the house of a friend whose mother was French.  (“What’s that smell?” I asked, as she melted some in a frying pan.)

(I grew up in an age when margarine was considered edible.)

There are differences in metabolism, of course.  Some people (many of them seemingly men) are just lucky.  There are also differences in the way that weight is carried, bone structure, bone density.  (Did I mention my “big bones?”)

Did I also mention that I exercise every day?   I live in a city where a certain amount of exercise is necessary to function at all.   But I do more than just walk to and from the subway–I do special movements on machines to  exercise my arms, my legs,  my lungs.

But the one thing I may not exercise enough is restraint.

When you graze all day, even on “healthy snacks”, the calories simply add up.  My husband, a single-tasker,  tends to sit down to eat and to focus on what he’s eating  (if only not to accidentally bite the inside of his mouth.)  I, on the other hand, a multi-tasker, eat by stealth, taking a bite here and there, and here and there, and, oh yes, here, and there.

The problem is that calories, pounds, are also good at stealth.  They creep up on you.

The Problem With Signs (Seeing Tips and Imagining Icebergs)

March 19, 2010

Regret Life?

I sit outside the World Financial Center facing a sign built into the rails of a fence that says “REGRET LIFE”.

This is an odd sign for a public space, even in public financial space.

In fact, it’s only my side of the fence that urges this vital remorse; if I look at the other side of the bend, slightly to my left, I read the words “SOME OTHER SIGN THAT PEOPLE DO NOT TOTALLY”….  (There are more words on that side, words that precede “SOME OTHER SIGN” but the glare’s just too intense for me to make them out right now.)

This is a problem with signs.  (And, maybe, life.)  It’s often hard to see the complete message at one go.

It’s a particular problem if you are relatively quick in the gaze area, someone who jumps to conclusions, who sees tips and imagine icebergs.

This tendency is made exponentially worse by even the slightest poetic temperament.  Such a temperament is generally accompanied by a confirmed belief in synecdoche;  it looks hard for the symbolic and nearly always finds it.   In the world  of the poetic, a single act is found to sum up an entire relationship, even a lifetime;  the minor escalates to the global.

Ah, drama.

The sun still shines brilliantly, but the air has shifted suddenly to the chilly.  It’s not a matter of clouds;  some (literally) minute change of solar angle has simply reduced the light’s warmth.

Still, it seems pretty darn sunny over the Hudson.  And beautiful.  People wear sunglasses around me!   At almost 6 in the evening!

“TOTALLY/ REGRET LIFE,”  I read now in the bend of the fence,  the actual corner, until my  gaze broadens again (almost instantly): “DO NOT”.

Have a Nice Weekend!

A Tale Told By An Idiot: Full of Bull(ock)? The Rielle Deal?

March 18, 2010

Michelle Bombshell McGee

The news, lately, is full of tales of men acting like idiots.  Following up on Jon Edwards and Tiger Woods… well, following up on Bill Clinton, Elliot Spitzer, Jon Edwards, Tiger Woods, and too many others to be mentioned… (wait a second, this is news?)  Okay, okay… .  Following up on a whole bunch of idiotic famous males, the American populace now has Jesse James, cheating husband of Oscar-winning Sandra Bullock.

The media, completely sick of health care, is making a big deal of Jesse James’ betrayal of Bullock.  Is there an “Oscar Curse?” reporters ask, a curse that afflicts Best Actresses?

The reporters’ voices are somber, knowing, smug (as if to say, of course, there’s an Oscar Curse.  How can a man be expected to deal with a hard-working, super-successful, wife?)  One suspects, however, that this question is mainly an excuse to flash a backdrop of Michelle Bombshell McGee, Jesse’s lover—who, for some reason, is called the tattoo lady rather than the tattooed lady (as if she inked them on others, rather than simply had the ink covering a super-majority of her personal surface area.)

A friend has been haranguing me throughout the day with the question of how Bullock could have been stupid enough to marry someone like James in the first place.  He understands James’s defection—”a jerk is a jerk is a jerk.”  What he doesn’t understand is how someone as seemingly charming, smart and successful as Bullock could have ever married someone like James, a motorbiker reality star, the twice-married ex-husband of a porn star, a man covered with tattoos even before his trysts with the tattoo lady.

All I can come up with is low self-esteem.   But it does make me think that maybe the news is not just full of tales of men who are idiots, but women who’ve also been a bit idiotic.   Which, in turn, raises the specter of Rielle Hunter

Who now, unfortunately, feels more than comfortable talking about her affair with Johnny Edwards.  “Had I spoken [before],” Rielle says, “I would have emasculated him. And I could not emasculate him.”

Do I really need to hear this?

The Oscar Curse.  The Rielle deal.

And maybe it’s not just men and women being idiotic, but the taletellers too.   The news stories begin to seem almost Shakespearean.

But not quite.

Orange, Foot, Chickpeas – Poem For the Busy – Labor Leader in Ahmadabad

March 16, 2010

Orange, foot, chick peas

The getting-more-sleep venture that I discussed in yesterday’s post isn’t really working, but the driven, drinking-lots-of-strong-tea, business is going gangbusters.  Tonight, I make the overly-busy person’s hummus;  this consisted of leftover (canned) chick peas poured into a seemingly-clean mug, topped with a couple of spoonfuls of tahini, sprinkled with roughly minced garlic.  Yes, it sounds pathetic, but was actually very good, the mug turning out not to have been truly cleaned but instead to contain a very thin residue of  Emergen-C (a Vitamin C drink).  Okay, that too sounds kind of awful–even I was a little grossed out when I connected the mug to my morning’s Emergen-C–but it turned out to impart the whole combination with a delicious citrus-y flavor.

It is important, when stressed, to maintain a cheerful attitude.   Here’s a poem at least tangentially about that:

Have I learned anything?

Ah this is better.
This is sitting down.
This is getting some tea.
This is biting into an orange peel, just slightly, before peeling.
This is biting into the orange.
I think about the labor leader I knew in Ahmadabad.
How they would bring him his coffee
in the morning, me my tea.
He had given up tea, he said,
when Gandhi said to, and ever since,
taking a hot slurp,
he had never drunk it.
Because of the British.

In the same way, in the car,
he took out all his toiletries, one by one, handing
them to me for examination:
a small soap still wrapped in its green labeled paper,
collected from an Indian hotel,
his razor, his comb—he combed
his close cropped hair before handing it to me as if
to show its use—a small towel–
he really didn’t have very much–a small
scissors.  His feet were up
on the seat.  Now
he brought one to his knee, shifting
his white cloth dhoti, and
clipped the toe nails quickly, first
one foot then the other.
He collected as he clipped
the small white crusts of nail, then
opened the window a bit wider
to toss them out.

“You see how I am always busy,” he said.  “Never
a moment idle, wasted.  I am busy all the time,
you see how I am doing it.”
He took the toiletries back from me.

I finish my breakfast slowly,
just sitting.

All rights reserved.

Feeling Special, If Not Free

March 14, 2010

Plane

Agh!  (Translation:  Ugh!)   A rainy weekend with lots of work-work (as distinguished from fun-work.)

There is something about working on both days of a week-end which makes one feel automatically deprived, even when also feeling extremely grateful to have the job.

We like to feel special, not, in other words, like drudges.  A week-end of work makes one long for the magical escape, that liberation that waits just around the corner.

Perhaps as a result of that longing, I actually opened and read the Nigerian email that I received this morning.  As a practicing attorney, I get one of these almost every day.  (They seem to be mainly generated from Nigeria, but come from other places as well.)   They involve millions of dollars or British pounds which are awaiting my pick-up if I will only co-operate in some scheme to help a widow, orphan, business partner, collect some mysteriously elusive inheritance, or lottery winnings.  Sometimes, as in today’s mail, it’s an inheritance or lottery winnings actually intended for me.  Today’s subject line  read “dead or alive!!!”  Its sender “Mr.Ron Mills” from “Standard International Bank PLC” warned me that someone named John K. Wheeler was claiming I was dead and trying to collect $2.5 million dollars held in my name.  Mr. Mills, though about to accede to Mr. John Wheeler’s claims, asked: “Did you sign any Deed of Assignment in favor of (MR JOHN WHEELER). Thereby making him the current beneficiary with this following account details….”

Who writes these emails?  What do they hope to gain by them?

On top of the fantastic  elements of the stories (Cinderella diving into Ocean’s Eleven), there are always telltale signs of the scam—awkward word usage, punctuation and grammar mistakes, generic addresses,  as in the email from “Timothy Geithner”, asking me to reply at a  “yahoo” address.  (You know how the Treasury Department always uses those for their high-level employees.)

The urge to feel lucky, singled out, is a deep one.  (An example that comes to a brain suffering from the renewed imprint of Robert Pattinson is the whole Twilight craze—certainly a huge part of that mania arises from the very ordinary-seeming heroine turning out to have special blood, a not-visible-on-the-surface quality which elevates her from the humdrum to the extraordinary.)

My mother calls me excitedly this morning, telling me of an offer received in the mail from her favorite credit card company–free airplane tickets.

I assure her that the tickets are probably not truly “free”.  She checks out the offer’s “details,” reading aloud some fine print about the continental United States.

My mom is a child of the Great Depression;  if something is free, it feels almost a sin to pass it up.  Accordingly, even though she and my father have not felt up to plane travel for the last several years, she immediately begins making plans (at least theoretical plans).

I tell her that there really is a probable catch here, something you need to buy, subscribe to.   She explains that they “have had that card for a long time.”  (I think this means that they are due a thank you from the company.)

“Yes, but—”

“Maybe they just want to get more people on the airplanes?” she answers.

“No.”

“It says ‘free'” she tries again, “even on the envelope.”

Why should I cast a shadow over her sense of good luck?  Just because John K. Wheeler is trying to steal my 2.5 million?

“So then, maybe they are,” I sigh.