Robert Pattinson says that he doesn’t understand Edward Cullen’s appeal to women: “if Edward wasn’t a fictional character and you met him in reality, he is like one of those guys who would probably be an axe murderer or something.”
Edward Cullen, in case you don’t know, is the hero of the enormously popular Twilight series by Stephenie Meyer; the vampire who falls in love with a human girl, Bella, whose scent holds a unique and nearly irresistible attraction for him.
By strange happenstance, Edward also holds a unique and nearly irresistible attraction for Bella. Bella , and about a zillion other women, who, since the publication of the series have gone gaga. Though a fictional character, the web is full of Edward Cullen fan clubs. Pattinson, a human stand-in for Cullen, is mobbed in the streets.
I have to admit that I am one of Edward’s admirers, though I try, given my age and education level, to keep it a secret.
Still, I very much understand Pattinson’s confusion. There is a lot about Edward that really should not be likeable.
First, although Edward and his family aspire a lifestyle of vampire vegetarianism in the books (i.e. they don’t regularly suck the blood of humans), Edward admits to a past of vigilantism. He tells us he spent at least ten years cutting down (and drinking the blood of) assorted assailants who, but for him, would have assaulted otherwise defenseless women in dark alleys and elsewhere.
(Sorry, Rob, but women sort of like that kind of thing.)
Secondly, Edward has a self-confessed problem with his temper, a potential for murderous rage. (But hey, it’s self-confessed. And in Edward’s defense, he always controls the rages. Also, they are directed at people, usually men, who are either insulting, threatening, attacking, or otherwise laying an unwarranted claim to, his girl.)
Third, he regularly drives over 100 miles an hour. (But has never had an accident.)
Fourth, he lies frequently (but in an almost dutiful way, striving to either a. protect his girl again, or b. protect his family.)
Fifth, he’s more than a bit of a stalker. Which is creepy. But again, there’s the protecting the girl thing going on. Oh yes, and the adoration thing. (More on this later.) And, even as he stalks, the reader always has the feeling that he would go away if Bela wanted him too (which she wouldn’t.) (Or at least he’d stay out of sight.)
He’s kind of a control freak too. (Though he backs off on that one in Book 3.) And did I mention the protecting his girl bit? And the adoration thing.
The two negative behaviors which are not really justified in the books are, first, an occasional prissiness. But hey, Stephanie Meyer’s a morman. And besides that, Edward’s human instincts (that is, his sex drive) have been buried for eighty years by his blood drive. It takes a while for lust to triumph over blood lust. (Nearly three books.) And, oh yes, did I mention the protective thing? And the adoration?
The second fault is more serious. This is Edward’s…passivity, the way he and the other Cullens allow various non-vegetarian vampires to suck their way through nearby humans without much of an attempt to rein them in (except when they are threatening Edward’s girl Bella). To their defense, there’s only so much they can do, right? But, at the same time, they do seem a bit uncaring, standing by in discomfort, but not true suffering, for example, as a large group of tourists is devoured (okay they’re tourists.)
In other words, Edward is no super hero charging around saving the world. To be fair, he warns Bella of that in Book I. Sort of: “what if I’m not a super hero? What if I’m the bad guy?’
But when someone with Edward’s/Robert Pattinson’s eyes, lips, bone structure, HAIR, asks a question like that, what can Bella, the viewer, and the reader possibly say?
OMG.
To be continued.
P.S. Please check out 1 Mississippi at Amazon, counting book for kids and elephants: http://www.amazon.com/1-Mississippi-Karin-Gustafson/dp/0981992307/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1248829291&sr=8-1
If you’ve seen the book, and like it, please review!
Recent Comments