Archive for November 2009

New Moon -The Missing Moments

November 23, 2009

Chris Weitz and Summit Entertainment have struck gold with Twilight Saga New Moon. Frankly, any regular ManicDDaily reader could have predicted this:  while Kristen Stewart manages to embody both the ordinary and heroic—a combination of qualities that many young girls envisage in themselves, Robert Pattinson embodies (literally) what many young girls envisage for themselves.   And then there’s the extra set of muscles, bright smile, and uncannily canine shagginess of Taylor Lautner.

Where the movie fails, though, is in targeting the needs of tweens, a core fan group, for quirky scenes, lines and gestures which can be repeatedly replayed  (i) in their heads, and (ii) on their downloaded versions of the movie,  (iii)  preferably, at a slumber party.

The first movie, Twilight, had an abundance of these quirky, (one might  say) goofy, moments.  They were camp, but could somehow bear the weight of repeated viewing:  (i) RPatz’s shaken/frozen face after he stops the careening car; (ii) “I’m a killer, Bella,” (iii) the whole “you shouldn’t have said that,” “spider monkey,” thing (iv)  the first kiss;  (v) the second kiss; (vi) the third kiss.

New Moon has remarkably few of these quirky moments —moments that one can imagine young girls watching again and again in giggles and pajamas.   In my pre-vcr/dvr youth, this need was filled by our actual re-enactment of scenes.  My personal favorite was Olivia Hussey’s death scene in Zeferelli’s Romeo and Juliet, which I performed with great gusto and convincing gasps on numerous all-girl occasions.   “Oh happy dagger, this is thy sheathe.  There rust and let me die.”   (Yes, I was a weird kid.)

But what would a weird kid re-enact in New Moon?  All I can come up with (and these are no match for Hussey) are (i)  Bella’s single-arched-browed “kiss me,”,  and (ii) Dakota Fanning’s smiling “this may hurt a little.”

So, will this lack of re-enactable scenes translate into a lack of repeated viewings?  A drastic downfall in ticket and DVD sales after the initial hot weekend?

I doubt it.  The film still has a lot of Rob Pattinson abs.   (Apparently, even 109 year-old  vampires have adopted modern low-rise fashions.  Who knew?)

And, then of, course, there are kisses 4, 5, 6, 7…. But who’s counting?

Another Villanelle – “The Nap”

November 22, 2009

Believe it or not, I have found, on this blog’s “stats,” that there are almost as many people interested in villanelles as in Robert Pattinson.  (Well, maybe not almost as many.)  Still, there is an interest.

This is fortunate for me as the villanelle form is one that I really like.  (Check out my other posts on this subject, if you would like to read explanations of the villanelle form and suggestions about how to write them.  Check these out especially if you also like Magnolia Bakery’s Banana Pudding.)

Today, I’m posting the villanelle, “The Nap,” because it it feels to me to have an autumnal aspect–after the fall, as it were.  (I was in upstate in New York when I wrote it, when the leaves were fallen, brown, and slowly drying out.)

To all those who are afraid to try writing a villanelle–you’ll see that  I cheated!  I modified the repeating lines;  in other words, I gave priority to meaning over manneristic form.   (Ha ha!)

Reading suggestion:  line breaks, in my poems at least, are not intended to denote pauses, unless there is also a specific punctuation break, such as comma or period.

Thanks as always for reading this blog.  I very much appreciate your sympathetic interest and time.  Comments are also always welcome.  Thanks again.

The Nap

Side by side, we slid to a dry, still, place.
It was not a woeful drought of age or dust,
the softer dryness of a tear-trailed face.

We never used to find this quiet space.
Any closeness quickly clambered into lust.
But side by side, we slid to a dry, still, place

where hands touched in a sweat-free interlace,
fatigue overwhelming pheromone fuss
with the softer dryness of a tear-trailed face.

Some other time we’d find that moist embrace
where pleasure mounts to such synaptic bust
I find myself side-sliding to a place

as blank as emptied well, as capsized chase.
(My brain reacts so badly to heart’s trust,
the softer dryness of a tear-trailed face.)

But today, we two, exhausted by the pace
of time and life and words like ‘should’ and ‘must’,
side by side, slid to a dry, still, place,
the softer dryness of a tear-trailed face.

 

I am submitting this post into the Gooseberry Garden’s Poetry Picnic, with the theme of love and lost love.

All rights reserved, Karin Gustafson.

Also check out 1 Mississippi by Karin Gustafson on Amazon.

Scoring Yoga (The Fug of Comparison and Nag Champa)

November 21, 2009

I am a bit amazed that anyone would question whether the “spirit of competition is in the soul of yoga.”  (See New York Times article, of November 18, 2009, by Sara Eckel.)

I have done yoga for more years than I like to confess (brownie point 1); many years at famous yoga studios (brownie point 2), with celebrated teachers (all true, also Brownie point 3.)

I have also practiced yoga for the last several years on my own, without aid of teacher or studio (points 4, 5, 6, and an extra .5 for the word “practice.”)

(I just realized that I could have gotten a whole extra point on that last sentence if I’d used the word “shala” instead of studio.  Darn.)

Part of the reason I made the jump to self-practice (7.5) was to get away from the atmosphere of competition and comparison that fogs the atmosphere of most yoga centers as effectively as that sweet fug of Nag Champa and sweat.  (8.5 for use of specific incense name.)  Practicing in a center all the time also got extremely expensive.  (High fees seem to mesh with yoga’s soul just fine.)

I loved my teachers dearly.   As a yoga student, you have a very special relationship with your teachers.  They lie on top of you, they stand on your knees (8.5, 9.5); they place their hands, firmly, on your inner thighs, your shoulder blades, the small of your back, your sternum;  sometimes they even poke around your bum, trying to show you the exact location of mula bandha, a genital-anal muscle lock.  (Brief pause in the brownie points.)

In a physically demanding form of yoga like my practice, Ashtanga (10.5), your teacher will wear you down to a level of intense emotional vulnerability;  to continue in this practice, you need to extend the teacher an immense amount of trust.   If the gift of this trust does not end in orthopedic surgery, you will reap amazing rewards.  With your teacher’s help, you will feel super-human, doing handstanding flips and intertwining parts of your body that had had no previous acquaintance.  (11.5, 12.5.)

Soon, you begin competing with other students for the attention of your beloved teacher (who also happens to be, or at least seem, physically attractive).  You are cheek by jowl with these fellow students in most  NYC studios.  You can’t help but be aware of every touch they receive;  when the teacher seems to give them extra tummy rubs, you feel sick to your stomach.  (Subtle downward dog joke 13.5.)

You begin to hate your yoga teacher’s “favorites” in a way that is distinctly unyogic.  If you manage, mindfully, to let go of that hatred, you still try to be better than those students in whatever way is physically possible if only an earnest facial expression).

Comparison, and its side-kick, competition, sneak in even when you don’t much like the teacher.  Asanas (14.5) are sometimes held for a long time;  the teacher drones on.  Bodies are stripped down, clothing-wise; your third eye roves. (15.5)

If you are like me, you can’t help but get a little irritated at the snazzy people who, despite narrow hips, feel hip in their sleek purple body suits.   When they look around the room, they seem to see right through you (the distinctly unhip).  Again, you try to cast off the feeling of resentment (Om), and then you notice that one of those same purple body suits, who chants with closed-eyed fervor, and (you saw in the dressing room) has a nipple ring, cannot support a jump into crow pose.

You breathe deeply/heavily as you balance in your not perfect, but adequate, jumped-into crow.  (17.5)     As your slightly saggy arms shake, you concentrate on the pose (18.5),  and the Higher Self. (19.5) , and the Unity of All Beings.  (20.5), but you also notice that you are suddenly visible to purple body suit, and that, when you jump back into chataranga (21.5), purple body suit even looks impressed.

All of which does not convince me that yoga should be an Olympic sport, but does make me think it was probably wise for me to start practicing in the privacy of my own room.

New Moon – Seen and Ponderous

November 21, 2009

New Moon has now been seen and pondered.  This is easy to do as it really is pretty ponderous.  (Yes, Bella is depressed, nearly catatonic,  but do we have to be?)

The music is particularly unfortunate.

As are the costumes.  Whoever came up with Edward’s robe with the Voluturi, which looks, at times, as if he were a Las Vegas crooner in drag, must be the same person who came up with Carlyle’s weird pale sweater set with the ascot type muffler.  Oh, and also the knickery vest shirt and shepherdess dress outfit.  (Don’t want to spoil this one.) And  Edward in the blue silk pajama top.  Unfortunate.)

The actors do the best job they can (which is not bad.)  Their eyebrows and lips work very hard to convey depth beyond the sometimes goofy script.  The actual lines don’t help much;  these feel endless and redundant in the Jacob/Bella scenes; clipped and overly-compressed in those with Edward/Bella.  (You can see which team I’m on.)

Also, though the movie promised a lot of Robert Pattinson (in all the ghostly Edward images), there really is not enough.  What’s especially lacking is any exposition of why Bella is so crazy about Edward.  Pattinson’s looks and innate charisma go a long way, but, if you had not read the books and/or were not already fascinated by Edward, it would be hard to understand Bella’s ongoing loyalty.  Their relationship is simply not fleshed out—where are all the “sleepovers”?   While both Kristen Stewart and Pattinson are more openly emotional in this movie, the script keeps them in a narrow channel.   (Bella’s relationship with her father, played by the wonderful Billy Burke, has more nuance.)

Partly this is a problem of a sequel.  Several sequences seem like much ado about nothing, simply because the background story is not really introduced.  (The repeated screaming in the sleep, the skipping chase scene with Victoria.)

Perhaps that unfortunate sound track is supposed to set a greater emotional context, but it mainly conveys that someone in the sound crew loves soupy scales.  (It’s like elevator music that actually goes up and down.)

I felt sorry for Rachel LeFevre (Victoria), who was much more angular, red, and menacing in this film (and will be replaced for the next.)

The audience very much appreciated Jacob’s bulked-up shoulders; Pattinson’s every entrance was greeted with glee.  An amazing number of men were in the audience;  men towed along by girl friends.  These guys were generally very well-behaved, although in the movie’s moments of greatest longing, loss, and/or romantic reconciliation, distinct guffaws echoed through the aisles.

In short, a bit of a disappointment, and yet, well….I may just like it better second time through.

Friday!

November 20, 2009

It's Friday! (Elephant From 1 Mississippi)

It’s Friday!  Finally!  And sunny!

For those of you who are not Robert Pattinson fans – and  I understand in a tangible way lately that the word “manic” comes from “mania”, and “fan,” “fanatic”–apologies for the last few posts.  Note that I tend to alternate, almost simultaneously, Pattinson posts with more serious posts, so if you run into one of the Pattinson ones and Pattinson really is not your interest in any way, just keep scrolling down.  Or check out the categories on the side of the home page.  (This is a wonderful tool WordPress has.)  There’s a lot on poetry, of poetry, advice about writer’s block, parenting, and other non-Pattinsonian  subject matter.

Thanks for reading!  Have a great, hopefully-sunny-where-you-are weekend!

(And, if you get a chance, check out 1 Mississippi by Karin Gustafson on Amazon.)

Thanks again.

Summit Doubles Up On Pattinson

November 19, 2009

Just in case we could forget Rob Pattinson this week, Summit has released the new trailer for Pattinson’s next film, Remember Me.  (Remind me to buy some Summit stock soon.  Oh wait, it’s probably too late to buy Summit stock.  Darn.)

It looks good (if you’re stuck on RPatz.)  It looks like a part/movie Pattinson genuinely believes in.  (It’s always hard to believe that he likes either the Twilight Saga or Edward Cullen all that much, although he does seem to try.)

The movie appears to feature an angry, sullen, somewhat belligerent, soon-to-fall-in-love, wealthy teenager.  Although Rob does sullen and wealth well, he doesn’t really look physically belligerent, i.e. tough;  even in the fight clips cut for the trailer, it’s hard to believe he’s hitting anyone.  (One can almost trace the arc of fist bypassing chin,  like two actors on the stage managing a fake slap.)

And the made-up bruises/cuts manage to leave the chiseled line of his face remarkably unswollen.  But no one, it seems, will complain about this bit.

Laboring To Connect The Brains

November 19, 2009

The brain is a funny quirky creature.  I say “creature” because mine, at least, feels, often, like a separate being.  Separate from what?  I’m not exactly sure.  The self?  The soul?  Itself?

Maybe a more accurate description is that the brain (again, mine) seems often to be divided into (at least) two parts—the watcher and the doer, the judge and the experiencer;  the witness and the defendant; the onlooker and the looker.

I don’t mean to suggest though that one side is active, and the other passive.  Or that one is more analytical.  I have to confess that I haven’t analyzed the division that closely;  I’ve noticed that both sides seem to be fairly emotive.  They both crave and fear; recognize damage, pain, desire, joy.   Though my brain, at least, has notoriously unscientific notions of the causation of any of these shadows and bright spots; it tends to assign causation to external circumstances, happy or traumatic events, of which it can sometimes remember only the vaguest inkling.  Even so, outside factors are somehow a less troubling causative factor than the darker inks of genetic blueprints.  No one likes to feel that they are going to end up exactly like their aging parents.  Even when they very much admire their aging parents.  (In case you are reading this, did you get that last bit, Mom?)

Then there’s the whole subject of absorption.  By absorption, I don’t mean, escapist fascination (surfing the Internet for news about Robert Pattinson, for example.)  I’m talking about what it is that makes the brain click into gear.  And I don’t mean function, I mean, hum. What is it that makes the watcher and experiencer close ranks, the brain and the self interlock?

My first answer for this (at about Union Square, since I am writing on the subway) is work, preferably creative work.   I feel a bit like a character in a Chekhov play (Uncle Vanya, specifically), when I think about the importance of work, especially, of course, engaging work, work that one likes.

But, as the train chugs towards Grand Central, I realize that the category should be enlarged.  That it isn’t just work that pulls the selves together, but effort, intense effort, labor.

Which makes me suddenly realize why I have wandered onto this topic in the first place.  Because for me, the most intense experience I’ve ever had of the coming together of brain and self, watcher and doer, judge and experiencer, was some years ago on this very same date shortly after 1 a.m. when, after forty hours of labor (as in childbirth), I realized that a part of me could really not hang back, lurking in some cranial synaptical view chamber (as if behind a one way mirror).  This was around the time that the words “fetal distress,” and “push push push the baby” surrounded me, some in an Irish brogue.

The watcher/witness simply had to jump in; all parts of the brain and self were on immediate urgent call; there could be no holding back.

Everything worked together quite wonderfully, as it turned out.

Robert Pattinson On David Letterman – Cryptic Re Robsten?

November 19, 2009

Robert Pattinson on David Letterman – young, sweet, cute, diplomatic.  His reply on the question of his relationship with Kristen Stewart– a mumbled something about his having given cryptic answers to that question all tour–seemed eminently NOT cryptic, but politic, dutiful, even gentlemanly.   It also seemed a definite ‘yes’, especially when combined with what a wistful glance at the magazine cover, shown by Letterman, of himself and Kristen.    I say all that it my own politic and dutiful way as a fan.  There did seem to be a genuinely gentlemanly aspect to Rob’s answer, but I’m also guessing Summit, the studio in charge of the Twilight franchise, has a stake in keeping the controversy alight  (Team Jacob plus the hype of speculation).

Ah.

The pleasures of pop culture in difficult times:  Robsten now makes me think of my mom in the 30’s, deeply loving Shirley Temple, Gone With the Wind, Errol Flynn.

Okay, that’s an excuse.  It’s not just the difficult times that explains the fascination–how about charisma?  Good looks?  Charm?  The love of fantasy?

Ah again.

Other seeming proof of Robsten relation (sorry, non-fans), Rob says, not on Letterman, that Kristen cooks a mean spam.   Come on!

Political Acrimony–Throwing Out Baby With Bathwater

November 18, 2009

In their treatment of Obama, some members of the Republican Party lately remind me of a really angry spouse following an acrimonious divorce.  (Odd, as it’s not clear that there was ever a marriage there.)

Most of us have seen an Angry Spouse (hopefully not our own, or in a mirror).  But ex-spouses do sometimes go through these phases, when things haven’t worked out as planned, and when they are so furious, so cheated-feeling, that they are a bit out of control.

Frustrated, the Angry Spouse resorts to taking it out on the children (the “children” in this case being the U.S. populace.)

By taking it out on the children, I mean, badmouthing the other parent (you know who) to the children; undercutting his/her authority;  denigrating him/her with knee-jerk, snide, negativity.

It doesn’t really matter what Parent No. 2 (the non-angry parent) suggests; the Angry Spouse will put it down.  So, Parent No.2  urges the child to wear a bicycle helmet; the Angry Spouse goes on about how controlling that parent is.

So, Parent No. 2 wants to give the child an allowance; the Angry Spouse criticizes the allowance as either incredibly spendthrift or ridiculously paltry.

So, Parent No. 2 wants the child to do some chores; the Angry Spouse, muttering about child labor, tells the child he doesn’t have to.

So, the child has a behavioral problem about which Parent No. 2 expresses concern.  What? explodes the Angry Spouse, proceeding to blister the air with comments about labeling and low-expectations.

Maybe, says Parent No. 2, the child should take better care of his teeth.   “A little candy never hurt anyone,” snorts the Angry Spouse, buying a case of lollipops.

“Be respectful,'” instructs Parent No. 2, ” especially when visiting another country.”    ‘Absurd,’ growls Angry Spouse.  ‘Who made them king of the world?’

What’s always troubling in such situations is that the Angry Spouse, though perhaps well-meaning, has lost sight of the true goal, which is to help the child grow and thrive.  Rather, he/she, obsessed by fury and disappointment, literally throws out the baby with the bathwater.

A real life child, stuck in such a sorry situation, quickly learns to play one parent off of another, and sometimes ends up a pretty troubled kid. I’m not sure what happens in the case of a country.

Vampire Elephant Only Above “New Moon” In Terms of Height!

November 18, 2009

Vampire Elephant Contemplating Movie Ad

Vampire elephants getting pumped.

(All rights reserved, Karin Gustafson)