Posted tagged ‘Richard Blumenthal’

The Benefits of Being Embarrassed. (Before Being Found Out.)

May 18, 2010

Untethered

I have been thinking about a post I wrote this morning about Richard Blumenthal, illustrated with a drawing of burning pants (liar liar pants on….)  and I am concerned now that I was too arch, too glib.

The fact is that even though I feel pretty disgusted by  Blumenthal, I also can’t  help but feel sorry for him.   He’s had a long career, a distinguished career, which now seems to be in tatters because of stupidity, hubris, and, perhaps, cowardice (fear of embarrassment, fear of consequences.)   Who knows how the original exaggerations got started?  Perhaps he did feel a true connection with those serving in Vietnam;  perhaps he really did feel spat upon when he finished his long-avoided service with the Marine reserves.  Probably, he genuinely does feel sympathy for returning veterans.

Is any that enough to excuse his mischaracterizations? No.

Nor is it an excuse to look to our culture–its emphasis on self-promotion and anecdote, where expertise is frequently alleged on the basis of minimal experience (see, e.g. Sarah Palin on foreign policy based on neighboring Russia).

I’ve recently been reading the Horatio Hornblower books by C.S. Forester, about the perfect English seaman in the Napoleonic Wars, and also just finished watching the new episodes of “Foyle’s War” about the perfect police detective in Hastings (England), at the end of World War II.   In the old-style British traditions explored by each of these narratives, the heroic impulses are just the opposite of those so common today.   These heroes are not only stiff-upper-lipped; they are close-mouthed.  They forbear to advance themselves through reference to even true accomplishments; a self-touting speech would be deemed unseemly, undignified, even dishonorable.

But we live in an age of self-promotion, an age when memoirists and fiction-writers alike make up their autobiographies; an age too where everyone takes credit for the good stuff, points fingers with respect to the bad, avoids liability at all costs.  (People use words like “taking responsibility” but shy, ultimately, from “owning up.”)

None of this lets Blumenthal of the hook.  Still, what does it all mean?   That we should look for politicians who have the strength and integrity to sometimes be embarrassed, or even openly ashamed, of themselves?  In advance of being found out?

Hmmm…..

Richard Blumenthal’s Pants

May 18, 2010

Richard Blumenthal's Pants

Breathtaking spectacle of Richard Blumenthal, Democrat, Attorney General in Connecticut, running for Senate.  You’ve probably heard already–he’s the guy who got five deferments from military service in the Sixties, then joined the Reserves (which, unlike now, was a safe harbor from combat service, and basically consigned him to community service in D.C. and New Haven rather than transport to Vietnam)—and , more recently, has cited his service in Vietnam, or homecoming from Vietnam, in speeches that leave the impression he actually was there.

One big question comes to my mind, well, two big questions—the first being variations on how could he do it?   Oh, I’m sure there’s some casuistic explanation.  But how could he look himself in the mirror afterwards?  How could he actually utter the words?

The second is, why?

Actually, scratch the why.   Obviously, he thought active military service would seem more appealing, less effete, to a wide cross-section of voters than, say, Yale Law School.

So, I guess my second question is how in the world did he think he could get away with it?  We live in a world where the past is public.  Did he honestly think no one would check?  Granted, the press tends to largely feed off itself, simply repeating repeating repeating one brave soul’s original reporting; but in a campaign!? !

The answer to this question seems to be that, in addition to problems with integrity, Blumenthal has problems with common sense.   It doesn’t seem to me to be stupidity (which shows, I guess, a certain bias on my part towards the basic intelligence of  Yale Law School graduates).  Maybe egomania?  Maybe… arrogance.

The commentary of people reading about Blumenthal is interesting, in part, because it is so partisan—about half seem to say, “what do you expect?  He’s a Democrat.”  The other half:  “what do you expect?  He’s a politician—just like Bush and Cheney.”   And the other half (and my proportions may be a bit off here):  “what do you expect?  He’s from Connecticut.”  (Sorry, Connecticut.)

And then there are the realists.  Correction.  Maybe I should call them the wishful thinkers:  they simply say, he’s finished.

PS – they talk about strong politicians helping the election of others in their party with their “coattails.”   Will there be a drag-down effect of Blumenthal’s liar liar burning pants?