Archive for December 2009

Christmas Eve’s Eve

December 23, 2009

When I was a child growing up in suburban Maryland, it was somewhat unusual to have a working mother, or, as she might be called today, a mother who “worked outside the home.”

Just about all the mothers I knew stayed at home, though they also worked pretty hard—this was partly because the ones I knew best had more than six children a piece.  Still, there was something different about a mother who actually had a job.

On the good side, we seemed to have slightly more disposable income than many families on my block.  We took trips; we shopped at real department stores (and rarely at the “five and ten”); my brother and I had an assortment of private lessons (from tap dancing to piano).

On the less good side, our lives, without the attention of what was basically a full-time servant, were sometimes a bit chaotic; let’s say, rushed.

This chaos was most pronounced at holidays, because my mom usually did not get off from work until almost the last minute.   Christmas Eve Day was intense, the modern world’s post-Thanksgiving frenzy squeezed into about sixteen hours.  On Christmas Eve Day, a tree was bought (among those few remaining available), put up, decorated.  Traditional foods were purchased and prepared; presents were acquired.

The day was a bit like one long Iron Chef competition, except it involved stores rather than a kitchen.  Wrapping took place well after darkness fell.

Christmas morning was a joy to my mom partly because it meant the end of Christmas Eve.

I’m a working mother too.  And whether women become more like their mothers when they age, or the aging of children makes the planning for Christmas somewhat less of a priority than the payment of second semester college tuition, I find myself in a mom-like situation this Christmas Eve’s eve.

I have tried to stave off the panic and guilt by warning my family repeatedly that I’m really not doing a lot for Christmas this year, that I am just too busy, too pressured  (not mentioning the weird assortment of vampire novels I’ve managed to read.)   I’ve told myself too that my kids are old enough I should just take it a bit easy, let myself off the hook.

But I expect that by tomorrow, all those warnings, and even resolutions,  will go by the wayside.   Like a Christmas Eve’s Eve, burdened with the knowledge of good and evil–that is, of what good mothers are supposed to do for Christmas as opposed to bad mothers who don’t do all those wonderful things–I will frantically shop, buy, prepare.   I will get us to church, cook, wrap;  and when Christmas morning dawns, I will be very happy.

Another Unhealthy Emission From Palin

December 23, 2009

In the midst of reading Palin’s Facebook posts about climate change I ran into her newest post/poison about Government death panels:  “Midnight Votes, Backroom Deals, and a Death Panel”.  Her images conjure up Harry Reid, dressed the dusty black of a Christmas-hating Ebenezer Scrooge, in a back alley doctor’s office advocating death for all except patients seeking late-term abortions.

Part of what’s disturbing is how manipulative Palin is;  it’s sometimes does not seem possible that she believes her own rants –how does she miss the self-contradiction?   She argues, for example,  that the government health care bill reduces access to health care and promotes  rationing (hence the jump to the idea of the “death panel”) while at the same time she declares that the bill (because it offers so much, unfettered, access to health care) will be ruinously expensive.    (In Palin’s world, private insurers never deny access to health care, and those who can’t pay for health care seem somehow to magically not need it.)

Palin admits in this post that her use of the term “death panel” was “a metaphor”.  This, to me at least, implies an understanding that such decision-making bodies are not a true facet of the proposals.  And yet, she continues to bandy the word about, knowing how it has been, and will be, parroted by followers eager to find totalitarianism in anything connected to Obama.

“This is about politics, not health care,” she says, and then, so nobly apolitical, ends her post with the promise/threat that “2010 is coming.”

More Palin On Climate Change–Emit, baby, emit

December 22, 2009

Yesterday, I wrote about Palin’s tweets on climate change.   (Twitter–such an intelligent way to discuss complex scientific and political issues.)

Palin’s complete-sentence comments on climate change, posted on Facebook (another high level political forum) and in an op-ed piece in the Washington Post, are a little less fragmented than her tweets.  But they illustrate a similar disjointed logic that is geared towards “catchy” reductiveness, self-promotion, and a refusal to face true choices (a “have your cake and eat it too” mentality.)

Catchiness comes in “word bites:”   for example, she accuses California Governer Schwarzenegger of harboring a vain “greener than thou” attitude.  (This put-down does not make a huge amount of sense since she also accuses him of being too green.)   She  accuses Gore and other environmentalists of promoting “Doomsday scenarios.”  (This last is also strange coming from someone who, seemingly, believes in the Book of Revelation.)

Any science that finds a connection between man’s activities and climate change is “agenda-driven,” even “fraudulent”.  (Another odd comment given the known efforts of the Bush administration to politically manipulate scientific data.)  Nonetheless, Palin promotes the idea that there has been a huge conspiracy of scientists for the last twenty years falsifying scientific records related to climate change:  “Vice President Gore,” she writes, “the Climategate scandal exists. You might even say that it’s sort of like gravity: you simply can’t deny it.”

The purpose of this vast scientific conspiracy is never specifically stated by Palin; the scientists seem somehow motivated by a vaguely elistist wish simply to make the American people suffer.

Palin, eager to seem pleasing and maverick at once, typically attempts to pay lip service to both sides of the debate.  She proclaims herself a believer in climate change, and to have initiated “common-sense” efforts in Alaska to deal with its effects.  (Presumably, these efforts did not involve any limitations on snowmobiling, drilling, or safeguarding of polar bear habitats.)   Her bottom line, however, is that she refuses to believe, no matter what,  in any connection between man’s activities and climate change, while she is completely certain that there will be an irremediable economic cost in reducing emissions.  Ergo, emit, baby, emit.

A “real world”, as she calls it, analysis.

Palin andClimat Chng: Happn’g 4 Ions

December 21, 2009

As my family, with some embarrassment, will attest, I am not someone who feels a knee-jerk hatred of Sarah Palin.  I don’t agree with her on virtually any issue, but I think she is smarter, or at least, shrewder, than many people from my neck of the non-woods (New York City) admit.  I also have a soft spot for Palin simply based on the memory of her youngest daughter (Piper?), seen at the Republican convention, earnestly pressing down Palin’s baby’s wayward bangs with a saliva-moistened palm.  (It’s hard not to like Piper.)

But Palin’s blindness to reason and fact really get to me; Palin is especially upsetting because she’s so glib, so willing to cast aside the complications of truth to get to the beguilingly simplistic.  She’s a bit like a cheerleader: as long as something is catchy, short, and supports her team, she will (smilingly) say it, whether or not it makes sense, or is even consistent with her other positions.

The most recent example of Palin’s reductiveness can be seen in her remarks on climate change.  Palin’s comments were made in the form of “tweets,”  a good method of communication for Palin since fractured thinking is not only allowed, it’s practically mandatory:

“Copenhgen=arrogance of man2think we can change nature’s ways.MUST b good stewards of God’s earth,but arrogant&naive2say man overpwers nature.   (Palin Tweet, 11:44 PM Dec 18th from TwitterBerry ).

Earth saw clmate chnge4 ions;will cont 2 c chnges.R duty2responsbly devlop resorces4humankind/not pollute&destroy;but cant alter naturl chng.” (11:57 PM Dec 18th from TwitterBerry)

There’s no room for the complications of science and fact here; no space for actual data.

There’s not even room for eons of change, but only “ions,” those teeny little charged particles that (according to some bogus scientists) make up various atoms and molecules.

I understand that Palin’s position is based, in part, on her Christian faith; but her faith seems terribly reductive here.   Although Palin pays lip service to a broader view of the environmental equation ( “humankind/not pollute and destroy”), this statement seems just a spoonful of sugar (to help the development go down).   It’s worth noting that one of Palin’s earlier tweets that day congratulates the Alaskan legislature on fighting the Endangered Species Act, a fight in which Alaska is working to delist the polar bear and to avoid a listing of the ribbon seal, two species that have been harmed by a severe decline in habitat due to climate change.

Apparently Palin believes that the polar bear and seal can live 4 ions, even without a habitat.

Cookies!

December 20, 2009

Watch Out For Mustard!

Gingerbread Yankee

Gingerbread Baseball Glove

Gingerbread Cow

Gingerbread Feet

Mistake And Giraffe

Weird Tree

Tools

Many many thanks to those who actually did the decorating.

Manhattan Before Christmas – The Super is Everywhere!

December 19, 2009

If you live in Manhattan, there are several traditional signs that Christmas is coming–that big white star by Tiffany’s, the tree at Rockefeller Center,  the Strauss Waltzes in Grand Central and the laser reindeer dancing among its regular constellations.

Then there are the signs that are closer to home:

1.   Your doormen suddenly begin opening doors for you.

2.   The Super, whom you’ve not seen in a few months, hangs around chatting with the doormen (despite the fact that they are so busy opening doors.)

3.   Xeroxed sheets with the names of the doormen, the Super, the Super’s assistants, the porters, the cleaners, the plumbers, and even of the people who will come and paint and plaster your apartment once you move out, are stuffed under your door.

4.   Faux fir branches bedeck the outdoor café next to your building.  You realize, on closer inspection, that they have been wrapped around a collapsed outdoor umbrella, which has also been covered with garbage bags, duct tape, and little twinkling lights.  (It actually looks okay at night.)

5.  The huge inflatable rat that sometimes grins at the end of your block due to ongoing labor disputes has been replaced by a huge inflatable elf, announcing the sale of Christmas trees.

6.  The sidewalk holding these trees smells really good for once.    (How do they keep the dogs away?)

7.  You realize, at the gym, that you did not lose the ten pounds you said you would.  The reflection of the twinkling lights from the outdoor umbrella stand just below the gym window reminds you that it’s too late now (unless you can somehow manage a juice fast in the next five days.)

8.  You try a hair cut instead.

9.  The doorman, smiling as he opens the door when you come from the salon, tells you how nice it looks.

10.  You look for that xeroxed piece of paper so that you will spell his name right.

Friday Night Silliness – True Blood Turtles

December 18, 2009

Sookie Stackhouse, Bill Compton, Eric Northman, as Turtles

It’s been a very long week.  (I’ve never actually seen the show True Blood, but I’m guessing it doesn’t have turtles.)

Things Not To Do At An Office Christmas Party

December 18, 2009

1.         Pee against the wall of the banquet hall in which the party is being held, or even in an adjacent phone booth.  (I witnessed this indiscretion at the first office Christmas party I ever went to.  The employee did not last into January.)

2.        Mention, in passing,  either  (a) the tax research you were supposed to finish by today, or (b) any suicidal impulses.

3          Discuss, even intelligently, any obsession you may have with either vampire novels, or  Robert Pattinson.

4.         Order a sixth bottle of beer or thirds on the chocolate dessert.

5.         Drink out of the wine glasses, or eat off the plates, of any co-worker.  (Yes, I know it’s a sin to waste wine, or food, especially chocolate.)

6.          Be anything but thankful to any figure of authority, but not rubbing-up-against-thankful, no matter how many glasses of someone else’s wine you have finished.

7.     Ask for a raise between courses.  Or during courses.

8.         Ask too many times whether there is bacon in the soup.

9.         Forget to ask, if you are a known vegetarian, whether there is bacon in the soup.

10.       Eat the soup.  ( It either has bacon or chicken broth.)  Just stick with the salad.

11.       And the chocolate dessert.

Escapism – One Could Do Worse Than Eric Northman

December 17, 2009

A  couple of weeks ago, I wrote a post about the lure of mind candy when escapism hits. At around the same time, I wrote a post about reading nine Sookie Stackhouse/True Blood vampire novels in one week.  (This, I should note, was not a week in which I was on vacation sitting reading on a beach.)    Comparing the Sookie Stackhouse vampire novels to the few other vampire novels I’ve read (the Twilight Saga), I said that the Stackhouse books weren’t really such great re-reads because they were mysteries rather than romances.

A couple of weeks, and several re-reads, later, have led me to revise that opinion.  The Sookie Stackhouse books actually are fairly romantic, at least fairly raunchy, and they score quite well on the escapist/obsessive-compulsive/manicD re-reading charts.  (The audible books read with a delightful Southern accent by Johanna Parker, are also pretty helpful for the highly-pressured who eschew medication.)

I also want to revise my previously posted opinion of the character of Eric Northman (noting again that I’ve never seen the True Blood TV series.)  I said in my post that  I thought Eric was too devious to be a romantic hero.  While I think it very unlikely that Sookie ultimately ends up with Eric (because of the whole non-aging, non-childbearing, vampire thing), she could definitely do worse.

Re-reading these books has also led me to wonder what exactly people, escapist people, like about vampire novels.

Of course, there’s the utter (fun) silliness.

Then too, there’s the attraction (for female escapists) of unpopular girls suddenly being swooped up into a world of super-handsome, super-devoted, rich, handsome, strong, protective, males.

But I think what escapists are particularly attracted to is the dominance of compulsion in these books.  The vampires are portrayed as beings who, despite being control freaks, are implacably driven by the rules of their deeper natures–their desire for certain scents of blood; their apathy towards other beings; their inescapable hierarchies.  Anyone in escapist mode finds both these battles with compulsion, and the many guiltless surrenders to it, pretty intriguing.

Secondly, there’s the inner logic.   Once you make the huge leap into the world of all these crazy magical beings, everything else is very rational, ordered, in the books.  Certainly, there is a lot of violence, but it’s never random.  (Books with seemingly random, yet very real violence, like, for example,  Cormac McCarthy’s All the Pretty Horses¸ only make an escapist feel terrified; as if his or her lack of attention to the details of daily life could lead to some truly disastrous consequence.)

Finally, the dialogue-filled prose forms a comfortable groove in the stressed brain a whole lot faster than something like, let’s say, Heidigger.  This accessibility makes them particularly good for reading on a treadmill, of virtually any kind.

Go-For-The-Throat December–Getting It All Done Now

December 16, 2009

The last few years have led me to the conclusion that I should simply find a way to skip fall.   That sounds like a dance or marital arts move – as in “skip jump” or “break-fall”–but what I’m talking about is that breathtaking (in all senses of the word) period from mid-September (beginning from around the time of year that first the World Trade Center, then a few years later, Lehman Brothers, fell) until Christmas.

The very beginning of September is acceptable.  Even pleasant.  It can still get steamily hot, but there’s a halcyon edge to the sunlight.  The sky is more often blue than white; the farmer’s markets smell like apples; if you live in those parts of  New York City where they still have Korean vegetable stands, the sidewalks are laden with chrysanthemums.  Yes, in early September, you have to get the kids back to school, or, if you’re lucky, move them to college.  But, with practice,  you find that either of those goals can be pretty readily accomplished with several rolls of duct tape and a usable credit card.

But once September merges into October, a go-for-the-throat pressure sinks its teeth into New York City life.   By November/early December, this morphs into a go-for-the-jugular stress which makes one  forget how really beautiful the leaves just were.

So much to do.  Right now.

Do people live this way in the rest of the country?   Certainly, they did not in prior history.  They were physically busier—think of the difficulty of having to heat water just to wash clothes.  (Of course, in the City, I have to carry my laundry up and down a few flights of stairs, and used to have to drag it across two courtyards.  Yes, I appreciate that’s not the same as gathering wood.)

And yet, the busy-ness of today’s constant mind gyrations—the nonstop, if often inconsequential, “right-nowness” of a life lived on the computer—has its own wear and tear.  (Presumably, in prior ages people got to sit quietly for at least a little bit, watching the fire heat up their laundry water.)   Of course, people can probably sit quietly now too, even in New York, without multiple Microsoft “windows”, constant channel changing, commercial breaks, cell phones, emails, deadlines, if they have either (i) a large trust fund, and/or (ii) a certain force of will.

Enough whining!  I felt a tide turn today as we crossed the December mid-point, a place  where it suddenly became clear that what “needs” to get done before the end of the year either will (because it’s already almost done), or won’t.

And then, we will enter those freezing days of January, February, March, when everything—buildings, sidewalk, street, sky—becomes so grey that it’s hard, for a time, to measure the progression of the season.  The words “hunker down” will line our turned-up collars, and we will know once again that we are “in it” for the long haul.

Which, from December’s perspective, looks like a great relief.