Archive for the ‘news’ category

To The Catholic Bishops

February 9, 2012

To the Catholic Bishops.  I would point out that many times people pay for expenses with which they are not in total agreement.  Think, for example, of the many donors to the Catholic Church who really did not intend for their contributions to go to the settlement of law suits related to sexual assault and child molestation, law suits whose damages grew exponentially due to years of official cover-up.

Contraception is, unfortunately, still largely a women’s issue.  The government has mandated its coverage not because they are pushing a pro-sexual freedom agenda or an anti=Christian agenda, but because birth control is, for many young women, their major medical expense.  Historically, medical expenses that were largely women’s were not covered nearly to the extent of expenses relating to men.  (Anything related to women received short shrift.)  New laws are, to some degree, trying to right that.

If one were to listen to the current debate, some might get the impression that the government is forcing contraception down people’s throats, i.e. actually taking the little wheels of pills and shoving them down.  That the government just wants to beat up on churches.

In fact, it seems to me to have started as a matter of equal protection of women employees. The government has said insurance provided by secular employers (we are not actually talking churches here) that receive  federal funds should provide insurance that allows for full health care to women. The institutions are not obligated to accept the funding; the women are not obligated to use the health care.

In this political year, it is likely that some compromise will be reached. And I do understand that some in the Catholic Church feel outraged.  (The Church has not always been particularly supportive of women; and feelings about contraception quickly mount to a crazy pitch.)

But in the media (at least talk radio), it seems that the high ground is immediately granted to the churches, the government is vilified–and issues of equal protection for women workers get lost.

 

 

(PS – just want to note here I’m not anti-Catholic, or even against the Catholic Church.  I just hate the whole bandwagon that gets started about these things–as if there’s a huge anti-religious plot in the country.  This started over an attempt to give women’s needs some equal attention.)

Crazy (in Pic)

February 8, 2012

20120208-104021.jpg

Not feeling terribly well (physically) today so sticking to a picture rather than words.  Or maybe I’ll hazard one word: crazy.  

“America The Beautiful” Is Sung On The Campaign Trail

February 1, 2012

America The Beautiful Is Sung On the Campaign Trail

Oh beautiful (ahem-hem)
For spacious (swallow)
For amber waves of (votes).
For purple mount–
(My Ma-jesty…)
Above the fruited (pockets).
America
(corporations)

(Are people, my friend). 
God shed his (Super-Pacs)
On thee (ahem).
And crown thy (elections)
With (tons of cash),
From sea to shining….

(And the next verse goes something….
Like this….) 

(I’ve edited this just slightly-cutting three or four words and adding a fake hyphen–since first posting so I could tell it to the G-Man–the host with the most–for Friday Flash 55!)

(Sorry – Last Post Inadvertent!) Is That Mean Enough? (Flash 55)

January 27, 2012
20120127-070739.jpg

Looking Kind Of Small

Is that mean enough?

Don’t know; are they clapping yet?

Ethics…. grrr… tax rate…. grrr….. food stamps… grrr… outrage… grrr…despicable…. grrr…how
dare you grrr?…Iran…grrr…Latinos…grrr…marriage…grrr…leadership…grrr…
bad…grrr…bad…um…(grrrr) bad, bad, bad.

And what I really hate is all my opponent’s negative campaigning…

Grrrrr….

(Here’s my flash friday 55.  Tell it to the grrr G-Man!)

(P.S. apologies to subscribers for earlier post now deleted–sent out pre-content!)

Gabrielle Giffords Steps Down – I salute her

January 22, 2012

There is a tendency in this country to exalt the bravery of those who happened, very unfortunately, to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.  For example, while there were in fact many heroes who died on 9/11, it always seems to me a bit strange to label anyone who happened to be in the towers that day a hero.  I say that not meaning to diminish the suffering of people who died then, or in other tragic circumstances, or  to diminish the loss of their families, or even to comment on their personal bravery.  It’s just that the term has gotten to be used rather automatically in tragic circumstances, perhaps because tragedy–great losses–tend to bring out a hyperbolic lexicon; we want always to enoble a terrible loss.

Giffords, however, seems deserving of this label–because she was so trusting, because she was (and seemingly is) so service oriented, because she lost so much and has worked so hard in her recovery, regaining so much, because of an ongoing attitude of faith and appreciation and because of incredibly inspiring things like this video.  It’s pretty amazing.  I wish her well in her continuing recovery.  May there be no more such terrible incidents in this country’s future.

Friday 55- “Note to be Stored on Mental Loudspeaker” – If on a Ship Whose Lists Are Not Just of Passengers

January 20, 2012

20120120-095724.jpg

Note To be Stored on Mental Loudspeaker

If you–repeat–
are on a ship whose lists are not
just of passengers, but onto its side–

(Or in a building
whose neighbor’s aflame–)

do NOT–repeat–remain
at your table
(or desk), even
if so instructed, BUT,
without shoving or pushing, 
pass Go–
repeat–
Pass Go.
(This will not–
repeat–
be a game.)

This is for the G-Man’s Mr. Know-it-All’s Flash 55, and I don’t mean it to sound glib (recent events are horrific) but as an exhortation!

Have a safe and happy weekend and thanks so much for reading, commenting, just being here.

Fair Use and SOPA (Save the little elephants?!)

January 18, 2012

20120118-113539.jpg

I have mixed feelings about SOPA, the “Stop Online Piracy Act.” 

On the one hand, the level of internet piracy is mammoth; many companies make big advertising bucks out of stolen content.    This lawlessness degrades consumers’ views of intellectual property rights, and, I believe, makes it increasingly difficult for artists to make a  living off their work.

On the other hand, the internet is about the only thing in our culture that is free.  And this freedom is not just in terms of cost.  There’s a great freedom for people to make and post art–some of which is undeniably derivative.   I, for example, make a lot of little paintings, some of which sponge images from other people. 

I sincerely believe that the types of things I do are either (i) “original” or (ii) “fair use,” and that they do not infringe copyright.   (Note that I feel a particular absence of guilt over Andy Warhol, one of the biggest appropriators of all time.)

However, interpretations of laws are always multiple, and it is awful to think that SOPA,  if drafted as broadly as everyone says, could be used not to just curtail my little elephants, but WordPress itself for letting me post them.

And here’s one of the rubs–even if government is not interested in shutting down my little elephants (or donkeys, for that matter), and I, perhaps naively, do not believe that it is–I can easily imagine a situation where access-providers could over-zealously apply the law to protect themselves. 

And, of course, government could also get into the act.

So, while I am not particularly interested in protecting the pirates–and I do think some thought needs to be given to protecting property rights– I’m very concerned about maintaining freedom for my little elephants and big elephants, and other people’s too.  SOPA seems to pose real risks.

P.S.  my elephants have no relationship to any political party or even to Babar.  (I just like elephants.)

Martin Luther King, Jr. Birthday– Growing Up Outside D.C.

January 16, 2012
20120116-072957.jpg

My Not Very Good Depiction of Martin Luther King, Jr.

I grew up just outside Washington, D.C.  I don’t want to reveal exactly how decrepit I am, but let’s say that I have pretty clear memories of what some consider the halcyon days of this country, that is, the years pre-1968.

They were really not all that halcyonish.

Yes, there were some aspects which today seem kind of wonderful.  Kids played outdoors, often in back yards, often on not-very-trafficked streets, generally without need of adult supervision, and with zero electronic in-put.  Parents seemed to keep marriages intact (even when one or both was not all that happy).  (I understand that that last bit is problematic.  I’m certainly not advocating unhappy marriages!  I would point out, however, that people who are divorced are also not always that happy.)

But there were other aspects to these times. In my little suburban town, for example, virtually all of the African Americans lived on one run-down road, in wooden broken-down houses, in very conspicuous poverty.  Of course, there were African Americans who were much more prosperous, but they did not seem to live in my town.

It is hard to imagine what kinds of expectations kids living on that road had.  Certainly, from the back window of my parents’ car, which, until the desegregation of local schools, was my main view of that road, life looked very difficult.

Then came Martin Luther King, Jr.  Listening to him was like listening to Prometheus–someone who held the secret of fire–someone who was aflame inside–someone who with that fire and flame would bring true change to humankind.

In an age of hype and spin and bloated political correctness and rabid anti-political correctness, it is difficult to understand how revolutionary and inspirational King was.  Here’s to him today.

House Republicans (Fighting with One Hand Behind Their Backs?)

December 21, 2011

20111221-020753.jpg

In honor of the House Republicans’ refusal to agree to sign on to the Senate bill that will extend (i) payroll tax cuts and (ii) unemployment benefits, a few haiku:

“When I pledged no tax
raises, I didn’t mean…um…
for working people.”

“It’s the uncertain-
ty I hate, you know, all that
damn uncertainty. “

“I’m worried about
the working man. Can’t you see
how worried I am?”

And here’s one with a reference to Shakespeare:

Sound, fury, tales told,
idiots. “Job creators?”
Mumbo-jumbo? Hmmm…

I don’t like to be so political, but the current situation is just maddening.

I am linking this to the Sensational Haiku Wednesday (though the theme is spirit!)

December 5, 2011- “Double Check” – From Zuccotti Park to White House Press Room

December 5, 2011

20111205-084443.jpg

I got back to NYC last night after a couple of weeks away, and took my normal trek by Zuccotti Park this morning.  Lo and behold, there was a Christmas tree and lights.  Very pretty, though the Christmas spirit does seem a bit hemmed in by the layers of metal barricades.

As noted in prior posts, as a downtown resident, I did have some understanding of the City’s issue with all the tents.  That said, in the spirit of both the holiday, and also perhaps the 99%, I urge all to read about or watch President Obama’s comments at today’s White House press briefing on the continuation of (i) cuts in payroll tax and (ii) unemployment benefits, both of which are due to expire at the end of this year.

Here are some salient points from the video transcript:

(Re extending payroll tax cuts.)

“Last week virtually every Senate Republican voted against that tax cut. Now, I know many Republicans have sworn an oath never to raise taxes as long as they live. How could it be the only time there’s a catch is when it comes to raising taxes on middle class families? How can you fight tooth and nail to protect high-end tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans and yet barely lift a finger to prevent taxes going up for 160 million Americans who really need the help? It doesn’t make sense….

(Re paying for the continued payroll tax cuts.)

“Now, some Republicans who have pushed back against the idea of extending this payroll tax cut have said that we’ve got to pay for these tax cuts.  And i just point out that they haven’t always felt that way. Over the last decade they didn’t feel the need to pay for massive tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans, which is one of the reasons we face such large deficits. Indeed when the Republicans took over the house at the beginning of this year they explicitly changed the rules saying tax cuts don’t have to be paid for. So forgive me a little bit of confusion when I hear folks insisting on tax cuts being paid for. Having said that, we all recognize that we have to make progress on the deficit, and I’m willing to work with Republicans to extend the payroll tax cut in a responsible way.”

And now one further point from me, ManicDdaily, about both the payroll tax cuts and the unemployment benefits. Doesn’t job creation have something to do with demand?  And doesn’t demand result, at some level, from putting money in the pockets of hundreds of millions of people who actually need to spend much of that money?  Don’t these consumers also create jobs?

Just some thoughts (though I must confess that I never much liked economics.)

P.S.  The above sculpture is “Double Check” by J. Seward Johnson.