Robert Pattinson, Stanley McChrystal, Judge Martin Feldman – I know which one I’d rather think about
I suppose that today I could try to find something charitable to say about General Stanley A. McChrystal, the general who blabbed his discontent with various top level administration figures to the Rolling Stone (of all places), or, perhaps, something diplomatic about Judge Martin L.C. Feldman, the judge blocking Obama’s moratorium on deep-water drilling. Unfortunately, I don’t have enough energy to quash the cynicism, despair, and plain old irritation that each of these figures raises in me.
So instead I’m going to focus on a proper Rolling Stone subject and a cinematic (rather than environmental) vampire, and one of this blog’s traditionally favorite people – poor/lucky/hounded/sought-after Robert Pattinson.
I am responding here not to anything that Pattinson has done recently–gotten a hair cut! Awkwardly kissed Kristen Stewart on stage! Seriously—a hair cut?!–but to one of the few articles in the New York Times that isn’t seriously depressing me: “His Cross To Bear; Heartthrob Vampire.”
The article discusses Pattinson’s fatigue with all things Twilight, including (quite understandably) the fame and the fame surrounding the fame, the phenomenon and the phenomenon of the phenomenon. (Our media is so self-referential that attention is itself a huge story.)
Poor Pattinson reminds me of King Midas, except that everything he touches turns to Twilight –no, that’s not right – everything Twilight that he touches turns to gold. And everyone wants gold, right? Rob seems a bit unsure at this point.
And yet, grateful, always grateful. (Unlike some Generals we could name.)
The Twilight success has theoretically given Rob freedom to do whatever he wants, whether or not it makes sense (like some judges), but because his other projects have not, thus far, been terribly successful, they supposedly risk tying him further to Twilight, causing him to be the guy who is only deemed successful as Edward Cullen.
I, for one (smitten and non-McChrystally loyal), don’t believe that. The problem with Rob’s other projects has not been his performance, so much as a quirk in the overall project: any movie in which a Brit, an Irishman, and an Aussie, sit down to discuss the New York Yankees is going to lack a certain credibility for U.S. viewers. (Remember Me performed much better overseas.)
Still, Pattinson’s been working non-stop for the last few months. Can all the other films counterbalance his identification with handsome vampires: we’ll/I’ll see. In the meantime, there’s always Eclipse coming out on June 30th. Yes, it looks bloated, overproduced, schmaltzy, draggy, and his eyebrows are way too thick.
But at least he’s not threatening pelicans, nor talking trash.
Share this:
Related
This entry was posted on June 22, 2010 at 8:24 pm and is filed under news, Robert Pattinson, Uncategorized. You can subscribe via RSS 2.0 feed to this post's comments.
Tags: Eclipse, Edward Cullen, loyalty to Robert Pattinson not like McChrystal, manicddaily, Manicddaily pencil drawing, Pattinson with short hair drawing, pencil portrait of Robert Pattinson, Remember Me, Robert Pattinson and Twilight Fatigue, Robert Pattinson as Twilight King Midas, Robert Pattinson compared to General STanley McChrystal and Judge Martin Feldman, Robert Pattinson not destroying pelicans, Robert Pattinson with short hair, Robert Pattinson's strategy
You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.2 Comments on “Robert Pattinson, Stanley McChrystal, Judge Martin Feldman – I know which one I’d rather think about”
I'd love to hear from you! Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

June 22, 2010 at 8:37 pm
Yes, Rob does seem to be the lesser of all we could complain about today. I like him just for the fact he has yet to be arrested for a DUI or enter rehab.
As for the good General… Am I the only won that the excuse “poor judgment” is wearing thin on? It didn’t work for Jesse James either.
Hopefully, Obama can get the judge’s ruling overturned based on his oil company financial holdings. What a tool.
Like your writing and your point of view. I’ll visit again.
June 22, 2010 at 8:39 pm
Thanks so much for reading. (And thanks for the comment – I agree!)